|

A sermon by
the Rev. Dr. Wayne Menking, Director of the Lutheran Seminary
Program in the Southwest, delivered on February 1, 2005, in Christ
Chapel
Texts:
Ruth 4:13-22
Psalm 37: 1-17
Philemon 1:1-25
Luke 6:17-26
I must confess that, like most preachers, there are texts that
I just don't like preaching on. Of course, many of us generally
don't like those transfiguration texts, simply because we don't
know what to make of them. After all, what preacher wants to admit
that he/she doesn't really know what the text means? But perhaps
even more troubling than the transfiguration texts are these Beatitudes.
I confess before God and you, brothers and sisters, I really don't
like preaching on these Beatitudes -- and especially Luke's version.
It's not because they are difficult to exegete. Quite the opposite:
their meaning is all too clear. Exploring my resistance to their
message, I suspect, could be a sermon -- or a therapy session
-- in and of itself. Yet, it's really not all that complicated.
The truth is, the Beatitudes cut to the heart of the faith in
such an incisive way that they are disturbingly confronting.
My resistance can easily
be voiced on an intellectual level by raising serious questions
about Jesus' words. Do these words not leave the door open for
romanticizing poverty? Do they not leave the door open for a sort
of idolizing of poverty and mourning: the poorer I am, the more
sadness I bear, or the more abuse that I take for being a prophetic
voice, the more God will bless me. Indeed these are nice intellectual
ways to respond, but my resistance to these texts is deeper than
cognitive thought -- for a person living in affluence, these are
just plain difficult words to hear, especially Luke's version.
There can be no getting around it, Jesus probably meant exactly
what he said: Blessed are the poor
yes those who live in
poverty as distinguished from those of us who don't! And blessed
are the hungry
.yes, those who will go to bed tonight without
food and whose stomachs growl because there is nothing in them.
What could Jesus have
meant? Is poverty something to which I should aspire for the sake
of God's blessing? Is hunger something I should desire so that
I will be blessed by God? And if it is that he was speaking directly
to those who were sitting right out there on the margins of society
-- the truly poor and hungry, the truly grief stricken, those
who were excluded from the mainstream of society for the sake
of the faith -- what in God's name can these words mean for me
and for those of us who are not poor, those of us who will eat
more than our fill tonight, or those of us who enjoy a place of
privilege in society?
If there's any entrée
that I have into this array of states of being for which God seems
to have a deep and abiding affinity, it is grief! I do know something
about that -- not that it is a constant state of being in my life
as poverty and hunger are for some, but at least I've been there
and I know something about it
and I suspect you do, too.
And there may be our
connection.
Grief, at least when
acknowledged and felt, has a ways of stripping us bare. Whatever
pretences we have had about our life, our security, our well being,
the pain of grief pierces them all and brings us to the stark
awareness that we are as vulnerable to the ultimate powers of
death as anyone else. Like poverty and hunger, albeit perhaps
not with the same intensity, grief has a way of bringing us to
our knees. It has a way of bringing us to life's hardest reality:
life is not ours to possess, to control or manipulate. When in
the depths of our mourning, we know that the next day can only
come out of grace, for we have neither the strength nor the will
to create it on your own.
And therein may be
the key to this whole text.
Blessed are they who
know in the depths of their souls the extent to which they are
dependent on God for their next breath! Blessed are they who are
not shrouded by pretense and false illusions of themselves or
the world around them. Blessed are they who have the humility
to know that they are creatures, not the creator.
Is this not what the
story of Ruth is really about? As a matter of fact, could we not
rename the whole book and call it the story of Naomi? For who
is it that is really stripped bare? Who is it that really faces
the threat of poverty and non-existence? Naomi not only loses
her husband and sons, she faces the distinct possibility of the
loss of life itself for no one is left to care for her. She is
left to be a beggar on the street. Yet in this strange and helpless
place, God creates life. Precisely in the face of extinction,
Naomi -- and indeed the whole of Israel -- is given life. And
it is a life not of their own making - it is all gift.
And so it is with you
and me. Poverty, hunger and grief are not states of being to which
we need to aspire. As a matter of fact if we were to aspire to
them they would in and of themselves become idolatrous. The truth
is that we are already there. Deep in our souls we know of our
hunger, we know of our poverty and we definitely know our grief.
The trick is that in our affluence it is difficult for us to name
those places as blessing. Yet they are. For it is precisely in
these places -- just as with Naomi -- that God comes in God's
wonderful and creative way to give life.
So maybe when it's
all said and done the Beatitudes aren't all that difficult. Maybe
they are simply a sermon we need to hear every day. Indeed, blessed
is the one who knows that he does not hold life as a possession.
Blessed is the one who does not live under the illusion that life
is hers to do with as she pleases. Blessed is the one who knows
that he is held in the depths of his suffering. Blessed is she
who lives in the humble awareness that all life is grace and gift.
|